A movie biography (biopic) can be a wondrous
thing. Or it can be little more than a TV soap opera, cardboard all the way. Behind
the Candelabra, Steven Soderbergh’s feature film swan song, despite having
been in competition for the Palme D’Or at the Cannes film festival, falls into
the soap opera type. The Palme D’Or, by the way, went to another film that
deals with a same-sex relationship, Blue
is the Warmest Color , and we hope that one lives up to its hype.
It is unfortunate that Steven Soderbergh didn’t
do more with the rich material and actors he had. Above all the material; Behind the Candelabra is about the five-year
relationship between the pearl and diamond-studded pianist Liberace and Scott
Thorson. Sounds simple enough, until you
get “hints” from the movie about what some of the more complex issues at hand were
that could have made for an amazing biopic. Scott Thorson was 16 when he met
Liberace, he was already seeing older gay men (the one who introduced him to
the pianist) and was living in foster homes. Liberace was extremely successful,
a closeted gay man and 58 years old when he began this relationship with Scott.
Just up to there is a complex biopic: the
millionaire, ultra eccentric entertainer –he walked around in a Norwegian blue
shadow fox cape with a 16-foot-long train and rode in a mirrored Rolls-Royce- with tremendous mommy issues, and the 16 year
old gay foster boy. And right there Soderbergh goes at it wrong casting 43 year
old Matt Damon to play the 16 year old in this relationship. Damon may have
boyish good looks, and his acting is actually the best thing in the movie, but he
does not begin to convey the strangeness in a sexual relationship between a 58
year old man and a 16 year old boy.
Matt Damon and Michael Douglas |
But that’s not all the story in this relationship,
the five years that Thorson lived with Liberace completely transformed the life
-we could even dare to say destroyed- of this man who now, in his early
fifties, is a recovering drug addict in jail. The pianist had Scott undergo plastic
surgery so he would look like him and was drawing up papers to adopt this young
man he was having sex with. It’s like a plot straight out of an Almodovar film
(o.k., maybe a tad less that The Skin I
Live in, but this is real life!). It
was going through this physical transformation that Thorson was also introduced
into drugs by the plastic surgeon that worked for Liberace, played by an alien-looking
Rob Lowe in this movie.
This entire plot is ho-hummly skimmed over in
the film. Liberace, who was into all kinds of sex excesses, ultimately and
pretty quickly grew tired of Thorson and discarded him. Thorson sued and
settled. The 22 year old young man received $75,000 from a man whose fortune,
by the 1970’s, was estimated at $115 million.
Liberace, played well enough by Michael
Douglas, died of AIDS and did call Thorson back to his death bed. There is so
little feeling in this movie, that even this scene is heartless. Did Liberace
ever have regrets? The man who, when Thorson asks him how he feels after his
mother dies, responds “free”, probably did not. Did Thorson? Most likely too
many. Does Soderbergh?
It could have been a contender.
Biographies in movies can be fascinating,
especially with such material to work from. The list of wondrous biopics is
long. Martin Scorcese, one of my favorite directors, has excelled in them with
movies like Raging Bull about the
boxer Jake La Motta (Robert De Niro gained around 50 pounds to play La Motta), The Aviator, about Howard Huges or Goodfellas. In fact, many biopics have been Oscar winners
for the movie, the director or the actors: Steven Spielberg’s Shcindler’s List about Oscar Schindler, Richard
Attenborough‘s Gandhi, both won Best
Picture Academy Awards; Spike Lee’s Malcolm
X, Gus Van Sant’s Milk about
Harvey Milk, for which Sean Penn won the Academy Award, Bennett Miller’s Capote for which Philip Seymour-Hoffman
won, Jim Sheridan’s My Left Foot for which Daniel Day-Lewis got one of his…I most certainly could go on. The point is made.
The opportunity lost.
Thanks again for a great review! Enjoyed reading it. I agree that in this case reality surpasses art!
ReplyDelete