Many
movies get lost in the world of aggregate ratings. I confess to being one of
those moviegoers that checks the percentages critics and the public have given a
movie before venturing into the cinema. Movies cost too much not to. But
I also make sure to check how my favorite critics have rated
the movie, picking up some insights in the
process. I have found, however, that because movies are so personal, you end up going for what you like and the artists you've enjoyed to pick your films.
If not, you may miss out on something good. Remember that many great movies
were not recognized as such in their time. Here’s a recent example of the need
to rely on your taste: the new Disney Cinderella
got better reviews than Chappie, the
most recent sci-fi by Neill Blomkamp. But I like Blomkamp, so of course I went
to see it. I also saw Cinderella. I
found the latter a bit boring (although I suppose many little girls of six
to fourteen years of age will disagree), and found Chappie a good futuristic movie… about our times.
The
two movies, in their own way, are fairy tales. Both in their own peculiar
manner deal with the beautiful spirit we are born with that ends up being crushed
by greed, ruthlessness, and a society that prizes those two “qualities” above
others.
Dev Patel and Hugh Jackman in Chappie |
The
audiences for these two films, of course, couldn't be more different, in quite
a gendered way. Cinderella is out to capture the hearts of little girls, who will
walk from the movie theatre to the nearest store to dress up in the blue
taffeta and blonde curls of the “heroine” of that movie. And it’s really not that
difficult to connect with little girls and show them how the good fairy will
help the young, kind and beautifully dressed girl succeed, all the while
sticking to her motto: “Have Courage and Be Kind”. But how do you connect on issues of social
justice, class warfare, urban degradation, civil unrest and/ or brutal racism
to a whole generation of young, white males that have grown up with their thumbs
glued to a game controller and their eyes to a screen that sucks them into an
alienating virtual reality? One way is to offer them Neill Blomkamp’s films,
which they are very likely to want to see, given that they are sci-fi and
amazingly stunning in their FX and virtual reality wizardry.
District 9, Elysium and Chappie,
by the 36 year old South African Director, make us feel as if we have finally gone
back to a time when science fiction films were works of art, philosophy and
social analysis, like they once were when 2001:
A Space Odyssey (Kubrick: 1968), A
Clockwork Orange (Kubrick: 1971), Alien
(Scott: 1979) and Blade Runner (Scott:
1982) filled the movie screens. A time before the blockbuster, money producing
machine that was the Star Wars
franchise broke into the theatres and the aisles of toy stores, spreading
pure entertainment, Manichean plots and a bit of mediocrity.
Chappie is the story of innocence and what
happens to it when faced with poverty, marginality and survival. The film is about
a police robot (an amazing FX feat), which has been given an operating system
so sophisticated that it can actually feel. Yes, Blomkamp is a Ridley Scott
fan, so in Chappie there is much
reminiscent of Scott’s androids in Blade Runner, both can feel, both don’t want
to “die”. There’s also a little of the
original Mad Max in the gangs Chappie ends up consorting with. All
good influences. But this story is looking to appeal to a younger crowd, so
there is more of a fairy tale element to it than in Blomkamp’s other films.
Yo-Landi Visser in Chappie |
It’s
still to be seen whether Blomkamp will reach the tech savvy young gamers with
his tales of social justice but, in the process, we’re given a movie that fills
the screen with seamless CGI, is visually stunning and tells the tales that
need to be told, even if they don’t end with a happily ever after.
[Check out "Fresh Cuts" tab above to read about Cinderella and other recent films!]
[Check out "Fresh Cuts" tab above to read about Cinderella and other recent films!]